WEBVTT

00:00:00.180 --> 00:00:08.740
Summary of Sunni concepts

00:00:08.740 --> 00:00:10.740
There is no disagreement

00:00:10.740 --> 00:00:15.789
Every issue over which the predecessors expanded their disagreement

00:00:15.789 --> 00:00:17.789
We can do as much as they can

00:00:17.789 --> 00:00:20.789
It has multiple images

00:00:20.789 --> 00:00:21.789
From her

00:00:21.789 --> 00:00:22.789
Firstly

00:00:22.789 --> 00:00:26.789
Difference in editing the subject of the dispute

00:00:26.789 --> 00:00:30.789
This is when one of the disputing parties goes to a place of dispute

00:00:30.789 --> 00:00:32.789
Other than what others said

00:00:32.789 --> 00:00:36.789
Or one of the parties called it a specific term

00:00:36.789 --> 00:00:39.789
The other called it by another term

00:00:39.789 --> 00:00:42.789
They both have one meaning

00:00:42.789 --> 00:00:45.789
It appears that there is a difference

00:00:45.789 --> 00:00:48.789
But when the subject of the dispute is edited

00:00:48.789 --> 00:00:52.789
It turns out that there is agreement, not disagreement

00:00:52.789 --> 00:00:56.789
Such as the difference in interpretation of the straight path

00:00:56.789 --> 00:00:58.789
Where he converted to Islam

00:00:58.789 --> 00:01:00.789
He explained the Sunnah

00:01:00.789 --> 00:01:02.789
And he studied the Qur’an

00:01:02.789 --> 00:01:06.790
These interpretations are due to the difference in diversity

00:01:06.790 --> 00:01:10.790
As they are common names for the same meaning

00:01:10.790 --> 00:01:12.790
It is Islam

00:01:12.790 --> 00:01:13.920
Secondly

00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:16.920
The difference in an issue has several forms

00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:20.920
They are all correct and not contradictory

00:01:20.920 --> 00:01:24.920
This appears in the characteristics of some acts of worship

00:01:24.920 --> 00:01:27.920
Such as the difference in the quality of establishing prayer

00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:29.920
Who says it is interceded?

00:01:29.920 --> 00:01:31.920
Who says it is isolated?

00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:35.920
Where correct evidence is provided for each formula

00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:38.920
And the difference in readings

00:01:38.920 --> 00:01:40.019
Third

00:01:40.019 --> 00:01:43.019
Disagreement over a specific issue

00:01:43.019 --> 00:01:45.019
The evidence was given

00:01:45.019 --> 00:01:49.019
Then the violator comes with evidence that contradicts it

00:01:49.019 --> 00:01:51.019
After investigating the evidence

00:01:51.019 --> 00:01:55.019
One of the two pieces of evidence appeared to be stronger and more likely than the other

00:01:55.019 --> 00:01:59.019
Here we must return to the correct opinion

00:01:59.019 --> 00:02:03.019
Each side may insist that its evidence is more correct

00:02:03.019 --> 00:02:06.019
This is something that can be disputed

00:02:06.019 --> 00:02:10.020
It should not be a cause of division

00:02:10.020 --> 00:02:14.020
But this does not mean accepting abnormal statements

00:02:14.020 --> 00:02:18.020
Or some mistakes made by scholars that contradict the evidence

00:02:18.020 --> 00:02:22.020
Rather, the violator must be advised and referred to the evidence