Summary of Sunni concepts
Allying with tyrannical regimes and the danger this poses to stability
He sees some preachers or some Islamic groups
Because of the pressures and tribulations that the youth of the Awakening and its symbols are exposed to, and the delayed results
To build bridges with the regimes that violated the rule according to the law of God Almighty
Alliances must be established with national or secular parties for joint work in the interest of the nation and the homeland and to fight the common enemy
Accordingly, the Muslim preacher is side by side with the secular, nationalist, or Rafidi
In single councils called parliamentary, popular or national councils
In these councils, concessions on the right and its principles begin, the first of which is:
Acknowledgment and satisfaction of entering into these councils that are legislated by other than God
The occupant swears to respect it
Here the goal of preachers shifts from seeking to destroy these infidel councils to becoming one of their pillars
This is enough to mislead and humiliate people
The most dangerous thing about these practices is the demolition of the doctrine of loyalty and disavowal, and the dilution in presenting the constants of this religion
If the preachers make these mistakes, the heads of the tyrants and the symbols of pre-Islamic times will rejoice
When they get tired of the methods of oppression, brutality, and imprisonment that often strengthen adherence to the call
They offer the preachers something more dangerous than that
It is an attempt to contain it with enticement and false promises
It declares ignorance to the Islamists
Please work for Islam through state institutions and councils
And here the nets catch what is caught by the lurkers
Those who try to cover these concessions with some legal suspicions
Such as their statement of preserving the concepts of legitimacy
Sometimes they argue that the fatwa changes as conditions change
Sometimes it is necessary and the hardship is removed
Sometimes they say we want to pull the rug from under the feet of ignorance
They justify all of this with wisdom and consideration of reality and surrounding circumstances
The Almighty said to His Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace
Follow what is revealed to you and be patient until God judges, and He is the Best of judges
And God Almighty said, “So be patient with the judgment of your Lord, and do not obey a sinner or an unbeliever among them.”
And God Almighty said, “So be patient, for God’s promise is true.”
And let not those who are not certain make light of you
Why do advocates of democracy enter into alliances with enemies of religion?
They began searching the Sharia for any suspicious evidence to support their actions
Such as their inference that the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, allied with Khuza’a, while they were polytheists
In the book he wrote when he first entered Medina, he allied himself with the Jews in the common defense
They also cited the fact that Joseph, peace be upon him, took over the treasures of money in the government of the King of Egypt
It is an infidel government, but he became dear in it
All of this evidence is suspicion that is not suitable for inference because the context is completely different
According to what they used as evidence, the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace, was the ruler who was obeyed
Whoever of the Jews or polytheists allied with him was under his command and he was the strong party
Whoever allies with them is weak, and this is the case with Joseph, peace be upon him
Where he was the one in charge and the one in charge
Whereas what they inferred from contemporary conditions
The powerful party are the tyrants and infidel regimes
While the Islamists are the weak party that has no command or prohibition
The analogy here is corrupt and lacks its foundations