WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.759
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

00:00:30.300 --> 00:00:32.299
The concise commentary

00:00:32.299 --> 00:00:35.299
on the book *Profile Cards

00:00:35.299 --> 00:00:38.299
of the Surahs of the Noble Mus-haf*

00:00:38.299 --> 00:00:42.299
by Dr. Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Aziz Ibn Umar Nassif,

00:00:42.299 --> 00:00:44.329
may Allah preserve him.

00:00:44.329 --> 00:00:46.329
Surah ar-Rahman.

00:00:46.329 --> 00:00:47.329
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

00:00:47.329 --> 00:00:48.329
All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of all creation,

00:00:48.329 --> 00:00:49.329
and may peace and blessings

00:00:49.329 --> 00:00:51.329
be upon the Seal of the Prophets and Messengers,

00:00:51.329 --> 00:00:54.329
and upon all his family and Companions.

00:00:54.329 --> 00:00:56.329
We continue with our concise commentary

00:00:56.329 --> 00:00:58.329
on the profile cards, focusing today on Surah ar-Rahman.

00:00:58.329 --> 00:01:00.329
I have three points of reflection regarding it.

00:01:00.329 --> 00:01:02.329
The first reflection

00:01:02.329 --> 00:01:05.329
concerns what is mentioned in the book regarding the name of the Surah,

00:01:05.329 --> 00:01:07.329
and that among its names is

00:01:07.329 --> 00:01:09.329
"the Bride of the Qur'an."

00:01:09.329 --> 00:01:11.329
He stated that this is based on the report of the hadith: "Everything has

00:01:11.329 --> 00:01:14.329
a bride, and the bride of the Qur'an is ar-Rahman."

00:01:14.329 --> 00:01:17.329
It was noted in the footnote that this hadith is denounced (*munkar*),

00:01:17.329 --> 00:01:19.329
cited, of course, from *as-Silsilah ad-Da'ifah*.

00:01:19.329 --> 00:01:22.329
Here, someone might ask: "Why then do you mention this hadith?"

00:01:22.329 --> 00:01:25.329
The truth is that this hadith was mentioned incidentally, not as an original proof.

00:01:25.329 --> 00:01:27.329
It was not cited as primary evidence,

00:01:27.329 --> 00:01:30.329
but rather to clarify why

00:01:30.329 --> 00:01:32.329
some scholars called it

00:01:32.329 --> 00:01:34.329
"the Bride of the Qur'an." As I mentioned

00:01:34.329 --> 00:01:36.329
in the opening episodes,

00:01:36.329 --> 00:01:38.329
with regard to the names of the Surahs,

00:01:38.329 --> 00:01:40.329
reliance was placed on the book

00:01:40.329 --> 00:01:42.329
*Masā'id an-Nazar* by al-Biqa'i,

00:01:42.329 --> 00:01:44.329
alongside consulting his Tafsir.

00:01:44.329 --> 00:01:46.329
Al-Biqa'i listed among its names

00:01:46.329 --> 00:01:47.329
"the Bride of the Qur'an."

00:01:47.329 --> 00:01:49.329
Where did this name come from?

00:01:49.329 --> 00:01:52.329
It came based on this hadith,

00:01:52.329 --> 00:01:54.329
which has been graded

00:01:54.329 --> 00:01:55.329
as denounced (*munkar*).

00:01:55.329 --> 00:01:57.329
I believe that this

00:01:57.329 --> 00:01:59.329
clarifies the matter

00:01:59.329 --> 00:02:01.329
in this manner. Likewise, for other Surahs,

00:02:01.329 --> 00:02:03.329
where names were adopted

00:02:03.329 --> 00:02:05.329
based on a weak report,

00:02:05.329 --> 00:02:07.329
a denounced narration, or the like,

00:02:07.329 --> 00:02:09.330
this is clarified simply to explain the origin of the name.

00:02:09.330 --> 00:02:11.330
This contrasts with the virtues (*fada'il*), in which I only mention

00:02:11.330 --> 00:02:13.330
what appears to me

00:02:13.330 --> 00:02:15.330
to be authentic, as well as regarding

00:02:15.330 --> 00:02:17.330
the occasions of revelation (*asbab an-nuzul*),

00:02:17.330 --> 00:02:19.330
while relying on the specific book

00:02:19.330 --> 00:02:21.330
designated for the occasions of revelation.

00:02:21.330 --> 00:02:23.330
The second reflection

00:02:23.330 --> 00:02:25.330
concerns the opening of the Surah. He stated:

00:02:25.330 --> 00:02:27.330
"It opens with an informative declarative sentence."

00:02:27.330 --> 00:02:29.330
We have previously seen that Surahs opening

00:02:29.330 --> 00:02:31.330
with an informative sentence are numerous.

00:02:31.330 --> 00:02:33.330
He noted: "And it is uniquely distinguished..."

00:02:33.330 --> 00:02:35.330
Here one must pause whenever an opening is uniquely distinct;

00:02:35.330 --> 00:02:37.330
it truly warrants reflection. He said: "It is uniquely distinguished by being

00:02:37.330 --> 00:02:39.330
the only Surah

00:02:39.330 --> 00:02:41.330
that begins with one of the names of Allah."

00:02:41.330 --> 00:02:43.330
We saw recently in Surah al-Qamar

00:02:43.330 --> 00:02:45.330
that its opening resembled

00:02:45.330 --> 00:02:47.330
the opening of Surah al-Anbiya'.

00:02:47.330 --> 00:02:49.330
Here, however, it is the only Surah

00:02:49.330 --> 00:02:51.330
that opens with one of the names of Allah.

00:02:51.330 --> 00:02:53.330
Such distinctiveness

00:02:53.330 --> 00:02:55.330
in the Qur'an,

00:02:55.330 --> 00:02:57.330
or textual uniqueness—

00:02:57.330 --> 00:02:59.330
a story mentioned in only one Surah,

00:02:59.330 --> 00:03:01.330
or a word mentioned in only one

00:03:01.330 --> 00:03:03.330
specific place—

00:03:03.330 --> 00:03:05.330
these matters are prime subjects

00:03:05.330 --> 00:03:07.330
for study and contemplation,

00:03:07.330 --> 00:03:09.330
because there must be profound wisdom

00:03:09.330 --> 00:03:11.330
behind that.

00:03:11.330 --> 00:03:13.330
Indeed, reflecting upon the opening

00:03:13.330 --> 00:03:15.330
of Surah ar-Rahman

00:03:15.330 --> 00:03:17.330
greatly aids in profound contemplation

00:03:17.330 --> 00:03:19.330
of this noble Surah.

00:03:19.330 --> 00:03:21.330
Furthermore, I would say,

00:03:21.330 --> 00:03:23.330
within the bounds of my knowledge

00:03:23.330 --> 00:03:25.330
—without claiming exhaustive research—

00:03:25.330 --> 00:03:27.330
I say that those who discourse upon

00:03:27.330 --> 00:03:29.330
Allah's name *ar-Rahman* (the Most Gracious)

00:03:29.330 --> 00:03:31.330
do not give this Surah

00:03:31.330 --> 00:03:33.330
its due share of attention in

00:03:33.330 --> 00:03:35.330
explaining the meaning of the name *ar-Rahman*

00:03:35.330 --> 00:03:37.330
and its manifestations.

00:03:37.330 --> 00:03:39.330
This overlooks a tremendous resource

00:03:39.330 --> 00:03:41.330
for understanding the name *ar-Rahman*.

00:03:41.330 --> 00:03:43.330
It has a well-known linguistic meaning,

00:03:43.330 --> 00:03:45.330
and so forth, as mentioned by

00:03:45.330 --> 00:03:47.330
the scholars who wrote on the Most Beautiful Names of Allah.

00:03:47.330 --> 00:03:49.330
But when we have an entire Surah

00:03:49.330 --> 00:03:51.330
whose name is one of the names of Allah,

00:03:51.330 --> 00:03:53.330
and which begins with this unique opening,

00:03:53.330 --> 00:03:55.330
one ought to pause before this Surah

00:03:55.330 --> 00:03:57.330
for a long time

00:03:57.330 --> 00:03:59.330
to attain deep understanding (*tafaqqah*)

00:03:59.330 --> 00:04:01.330
of the meaning of Allah's name

00:04:01.330 --> 00:04:03.330
*ar-Rahman*.

00:04:03.330 --> 00:04:05.330
Therefore, I believe

00:04:05.330 --> 00:04:07.330
that regarding the central theme of the Surah, it is better

00:04:07.330 --> 00:04:09.330
to add a word to the statement:

00:04:09.330 --> 00:04:11.330
"A reminder of divine favors and blessings"

00:04:11.330 --> 00:04:13.330
—this is obvious, as "So which of the favors of your Lord will you deny?"

00:04:13.330 --> 00:04:15.330
is repeated throughout—

00:04:15.330 --> 00:04:17.329
"urging

00:04:17.329 --> 00:04:19.329
the worship of the Owner of Majesty and Honor."

00:04:19.329 --> 00:04:21.329
Perhaps it is more fitting,

00:04:21.329 --> 00:04:23.329
in a way that draws attention to the significance of the name *ar-Rahman* in the Surah,

00:04:23.329 --> 00:04:25.329
to say: "urging the worship

00:04:25.329 --> 00:04:27.329
of ar-Rahman, the Owner of Majesty and Honor."

00:04:27.329 --> 00:04:29.329
"The Owner of Majesty and Honor" was explicitly mentioned

00:04:29.329 --> 00:04:31.329
because it appears in the Surah

00:04:31.329 --> 00:04:33.329
twice: once in the middle of the Surah,

00:04:33.329 --> 00:04:35.329
“There remaineth but the Countenance of thy Lord of Might and Glory.” (55:27)

00:04:35.329 --> 00:04:37.329
and at the end of the Surah: "Blessed is the name of your Lord,

00:04:37.329 --> 00:04:39.329
Owner of Majesty and Honor." Meanwhile, *ar-Rahman*

00:04:39.329 --> 00:04:41.329
is how the Surah opens,

00:04:41.329 --> 00:04:43.329
and it is the name of the Surah.

00:04:43.329 --> 00:04:45.329
Thus, it would be beneficial

00:04:45.329 --> 00:04:47.329
here to insert the word

00:04:47.329 --> 00:04:49.329
*ar-Rahman*,

00:04:49.329 --> 00:04:51.329
so that the phrasing becomes: "urging the worship

00:04:51.329 --> 00:04:53.329
of ar-Rahman, the Owner of Majesty

00:04:53.329 --> 00:04:55.329
and Honor."

00:04:55.329 --> 00:04:57.329
As for the third reflection,

00:04:57.329 --> 00:04:59.329
it concerns the dating of the Surah.

00:04:59.329 --> 00:05:01.329
I have previously noted that the term "order

00:05:01.329 --> 00:05:03.329
of revelation of the Surah"

00:05:03.329 --> 00:05:05.329
should ideally be amended to read simply

00:05:05.329 --> 00:05:07.389
"the revelation of the Surah,"

00:05:07.389 --> 00:05:09.389
and that the word "its dating,"

00:05:09.389 --> 00:05:11.389
found in the diagram,

00:05:11.389 --> 00:05:13.389
should preferably be written as "its era."

00:05:13.389 --> 00:05:15.389
Here I would like to mention

00:05:15.389 --> 00:05:17.389
that if you examine

00:05:17.389 --> 00:05:19.389
the dating of the Surah's revelation

00:05:19.389 --> 00:05:21.389
in the diagram, you will find it

00:05:21.389 --> 00:05:23.389
often more abbreviated

00:05:23.389 --> 00:05:25.389
than what is stated in the main text

00:05:25.389 --> 00:05:27.389
of the book. In the main text,

00:05:27.389 --> 00:05:29.389
Surah ar-Rahman is considered the ninety-seventh

00:05:29.389 --> 00:05:31.389
according to the well-known view, revealed after

00:05:31.389 --> 00:05:33.389
Surah ar-Ra'd and before Surah al-Insan,

00:05:33.389 --> 00:05:35.389
though the preponderant view is that it is Meccan.

00:05:35.389 --> 00:05:37.389
The correct view is that it is Meccan,

00:05:37.389 --> 00:05:39.389
and reports indicate

00:05:39.389 --> 00:05:41.389
that it was revealed before the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)

00:05:41.389 --> 00:05:43.389
openly proclaimed what he was commanded.

00:05:43.389 --> 00:05:45.389
However, if we look at the diagram,

00:05:45.389 --> 00:05:47.389
we find only the phrase: "Considered the ninety-seventh

00:05:47.389 --> 00:05:49.389
according to the well-known view, after ar-Ra'd

00:05:49.389 --> 00:05:51.389
and before al-Insan." This statement

00:05:51.389 --> 00:05:53.389
is outweighed (*marjuh*),

00:05:53.389 --> 00:05:55.389
for the preponderant view is that it is Meccan.

00:05:55.389 --> 00:05:57.389
So when someone reads this text

00:05:57.389 --> 00:05:59.389
in this abbreviated form,

00:05:59.389 --> 00:06:01.389
it creates confusion for them.

00:06:01.389 --> 00:06:03.389
This well-known report,

00:06:03.389 --> 00:06:05.389
as we noted,

00:06:05.389 --> 00:06:07.389
contains weakness, is subject to critique,

00:06:07.389 --> 00:06:09.389
and has been debated;

00:06:09.389 --> 00:06:11.389
it was mentioned solely due to its fame,

00:06:11.389 --> 00:06:13.389
unless contradicted by stronger evidence,

00:06:13.389 --> 00:06:15.490
and indeed it has been contradicted.

00:06:15.490 --> 00:06:17.490
Perhaps this occurred in other Surahs

00:06:17.490 --> 00:06:19.519
as well, where abbreviation

00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:21.519
in the diagram led to

00:06:21.519 --> 00:06:23.519
this issue. Allah willing,

00:06:23.519 --> 00:06:25.519
it will be corrected in the upcoming edition.

00:06:25.519 --> 00:06:27.519
So please amend it on your end

00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:29.519
and add it to the diagram;

00:06:29.519 --> 00:06:31.519
it ought to be added.

00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:33.519
Note also that

00:06:33.519 --> 00:06:35.519
the expression "and it has been reported"

00:06:35.519 --> 00:06:37.519
indicates that

00:06:37.519 --> 00:06:39.519
the matter is open to possibility,

00:06:39.519 --> 00:06:41.519
and that the report is not decisively established

00:06:41.519 --> 00:06:43.519
within the scope of my research, but rather subject to difference of opinion,

00:06:43.519 --> 00:06:45.519
or that I was unable

00:06:45.519 --> 00:06:47.519
to definitively evaluate

00:06:47.519 --> 00:06:49.519
the chain of narration for one reason or another.

00:06:49.519 --> 00:06:51.519
Therefore, the word "reported"

00:06:51.519 --> 00:06:53.519
signals this nuance,

00:06:53.519 --> 00:06:55.519
showing that the matter is not

00:06:55.519 --> 00:06:57.519
firmly established, unlike when it is expressed

00:06:57.519 --> 00:06:59.519
in other sections as "authentically established."

00:06:59.519 --> 00:07:01.519
I ask Allah to grant success to me and to you

00:07:01.519 --> 00:07:03.519
in all that He loves and is pleased with.

00:07:03.519 --> 00:07:05.519
May Allah send blessings upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, and Companions.

00:07:05.519 --> 00:07:07.519
All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of all creation.
