Summary of Sunni concepts
Issues of disagreement and issues of ijtihad
Some do not differentiate between matters of disagreement and matters of ijtihad
This misconception is common among people who have this misconception
There is no denial in matters of disagreement
This is a wrong statement and a corrupt belief
Not every disagreement is valid and the work is based on it in any of its aspects
Rather, the disagreement that is opposed by a text from the Qur’an or Sunnah
It is an abnormal dispute that is not considered and is rejected by its owner
This is an invalid statement
Denial should be limited to Islamic law only
Concerning definite and necessary evils, there is consensus that they are evil
Difference is not an argument in itself
Rather, the Qur’an and Sunnah are evidence against those who differ from the first and the last
A scholar may disagree with his question
Because he did not reach the hadith contained therein
Or because you believe it is not true
Or because he was distracted by it during the dispute
In that case, it is not permissible to follow this scholar even though there is evidence that contradicts his statement
In addition to other reasons mentioned by Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah in his valuable book
Lifting blame from eminent imams
And one of the implications of this corrupt statement
Serious contractual violation
When the correct, proven Sunnah is reported from the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace
Because there were those who disagreed on this issue
This means that the sayings of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and his orders
It only gains its legitimacy when people agree on it
This is a dangerous behavior that contradicts the origin of Islam
Which means surrender to the commands of God Almighty
And the orders of His Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace
The correct statement that is accepted in this field
There is no denial in matters of ijtihad
Issues of ijtihad are those in which there is no binding evidence or clear text
It must be clearly implemented
Or the diligence was in the jurisprudence of balances between interests and harms
In that case, it is permissible to exercise ijtihad on the issue due to conflicting or hidden evidence
A person takes what his diligence leads him to, if he is a scholar
Or what he is comfortable with and trusts in regarding the diligence of scholars, if he is an imitator